Are You Ready for a Disaster?
Added 1st Jun 2009Article Highlights
- Today, at least 66 percent of security decision-makers are already either primarily or completely responsible for BC/DR.
- BC, IT DR and information security will present opportunities for better alignment given their common goals and requirements.
- Incorporating BC and IT DR functions is not something that you can do with your existing security budget and staff. You will have to build the business case for a larger program.
Business continuity (BC), IT disaster recovery (DR), and information security are essential elements of business resiliency, with the common objective of managing the risks of business disruption. While all have traditionally operated as separate silos, they follow similar processes: they all require business impact analysis and risk assessment processes, and all have a heavy reliance on controls documentation, monitoring, and testing.
Security and risk professionals should apply a common risk-based approach to these disciplines to streamline processes, improve cross-discipline collaboration, and provide a common system of managing risk. So how should your company attempt to leverage common best practices, processes, and tools across disciplines to improve business resiliency? One way is to have the same senior executive ultimately accountable for their success.
BC and IT DR require the collaboration of multiple groups, including business owners, app owners, legal, HR, facilities, and IT. This gives the CIO the opportunity to increase their exposure and relevance to non-IT audiences.
Today, at least 66 percent of security decision-makers are already either primarily or completely responsible for BC/DR. They may be responsible for both BC and IT DR or only IT DR, but it's clear that as companies seek to institutionalize these disciplines, they are turning to senior security executives for leadership.
But running a company-wide security program is difficult enough. Why would IT leaders want to raise their hand to take on BC and IT DR?
DR is Your New KRA
Security standards recognize information availability as a responsibility. Information security professionals have always considered themselves responsible for preserving not only the confidentiality and integrity of information, but also the availability of information.
CISOs, CSOs or other head security officers have the skills to institutionalize these programs under the security umbrella. Successful BC and IT DR programs require the skills that most successful security leaders already have.
If it's not your responsibility today, someone will ask you to do it in the future. As companies begin to establish these programs, they must determine who in the organization can take on these responsibilities. Forrester has seen the following executives assigned the responsibility: the CIO or the CISO (the most common), a dedicated risk manager (typical in large financial services firms), or the COO or CFO (this is the least common).
It's an opportunity to make the security program more strategic. The tasks associated with executing security policies such as software patching and application security are increasingly being automated through tools, then managed and monitored by the IT operations team. This allows IT leaders to focus on more strategic business and IT priorities. In addition, both BC and IT DR require the input and collaboration of multiple groups, including business owners, application owners, legal, HR, facilities, and IT. This gives the CIO the opportunity to increase their exposure and relevance to non-IT audiences.
Related Articles
- New CEO Banks on Innovation to Revive RIM
- Electrifying Google Currents
- Enhancing User Experience: What They Want
- Enterprise Social Media: Vox Populi
- Taming the Terror: Eight Trends That Impact Indian CIOs in 2012


