It is in our nature to make things or situations more complex than it is in its true nature. The first step is agreeing that you have a problem. The road to simplicity is not hard.
In data centers around the world, energy costs are rising rapidly and consuming an ever-greater portion of IT budgets. Here's a sign of just how bad it is getting: It will soon cost more to power and cool a server over its
lifetime than it does to buy the server. Everywhere we look, IT facilities are running out of cooling
capacity and power. With multiplying numbers of servers, higher densities and hotter processors, data
centers are hitting a wall. Even though racks are half empty, many IT operators cannot add another server
into their environment. Air conditioning systems are maxed out and power distribution infrastructure is
completely utilized.
Today's challenging business environment demands that IT managers extend the business value of past and future IT investments while boosting the efficiency of their IT operations. Despite tightening budgets, business and regulatory requirements are driving major, unavoidable increases in information creation and long-term retention. IT departments, no matter what their size, can expect data growth rates to increase anywhere from 40% to 60% (even more in content-rich sectors) in the coming year.
There's a standing joke that business people never have to ask IT how long something will take and what it will cost because they already know the answers: it always takes a year and costs millions - and that's just for the simple stuff. If you don't find that funny - and why would you? - then you are going to have to own up to the fact that we in IT are addicted to complexity. And our addiction to the complex, the expensive and the clunky is increasingly indulged at our own peril. That's because business people have discovered that consumer IT is better than corporate IT. It has more features and is more responsive, easier to use, faster to install and a whole lot cheaper to operate. I'm talking about things like e-mail and Web hosting services from companies such as Yahoo! and Google, and the low- or no-cost office productivity and workflow software that companies such as 37signals and IBM provide. What is our objection? That it's not scalable in the enterprise? That it's not robust? Or that it doesn't feed our addiction for complexity? I think it's the latter, and I think you need to stand up and say with me, "Hello, my name is Mike, and I'm a recovering complexaholic. I'm interested in new ways to get things done."
Consider this scenario: you're the CIO at GlobalCorp, a rapidly growing company run by some whip-smart business guys with a knack for deal-making and spotting opportunities ahead of everyone else. They run operations in North America, Asia and Europe, and are expanding into Africa, Australia and South America. They move into new markets and new countries by buying companies and growing them. They exit markets by selling off business units in those areas. The COO and the CFO ask you to prepare a presentation for the CEO and the board on how IT can help streamline financial reporting and increase the visibility of operations around the world. Some big deals are pending, and they think IT can make a difference. If you're still feeding your addiction to complexity, a little voice in your head says, "Wow, this isn't a simple project; it'll take more than a year and Rs 4 crore - maybe more like three years and Rs 400 crore." If you're a recovering complexaholic, that little voice says, "These guys are moving fast; they aren't willing to wait three years. What else can we do to meet their needs?"
If you're a complexity addict, you round up a group of the usual suspects and put them to work grinding out a long-range development plan. You set a go-live date that's three years off, and you figure that in the meantime everything will just continue to operate as it always has. If you're recovering from this addiction, you bring together a small skunk-works team of business and IT people and tell them to cast off all pre-conceptions. You give them time frames to deliver usable systems to business people within 30 to 90 days.
You tell them everything is on the table, including things that have more in common with consumer IT than corporate IT. Under your guidance, they develop a strategy that relies on a collection of readily available IT components such as Web portals, dashboards and alerts, instant messaging and e-mail, data warehouses, spreadsheets, software-as-a-service offerings, and small programs that can be quickly coded, tested and put into production. I think it's clear which CIO is going to thrive in a company like GlobalCorp. But think about this: in today's global, hypercompetitive business environment, isn't the agility that GlobalCorp displays becoming the norm?