Huawei Australia chairman John Lord used his address at the National Press Club in Canberra today speak out against what he says are ‘myths’ about the Chinese technology company.
“There are a lot of myths that have developed around the Huawei and we as a company have probably failed to properly address or combat them. There has been a reluctance to be loud and boastful in public, and a reluctance to debate our detractors,” he told the audience.
He told the assembled media that “if you let misinformation and unproven statements stand, they will be regurgitated by your detractors, and in the end, mud sticks.”
The first myth, he said, is that Huawei gets cheap loans or lines of credit from Chinese banks.
“Wrong, in fact 80 per cent of every dollar of our financing comes from non-Chinese banks, two of these are Australian banks,” he said.
The second myth is that a communist party runs Huawei. Lord said there is a communist branch in Huawei, as there is one in Walmart, Nokia, and Samsung.
“And I assume the BHPs and Rio Tintos and any other large company operating in China, it’s the law. In fact, three out of four joint ventures in China have branch,” he said.
“But that branch has no say in our operations. It meets in non-working hours and looks after staff social issues and activities. It has nothing to do with the management of the company and is run by a retired employee of the company.”
The third myth is that under national Chinese intelligence law, Huawei has to cooperate and collaborate in intelligence work. Lord said the law does contain safeguards that discharge individuals and organisations from providing support that would contradict their legitimate rights and interests.
“And that law has no legitimacy outside China. We obey the laws of every country in which we operate in. In Australia, we follow Australian laws. To do otherwise would be corporate suicide,” he said.
The fourth myth, he said, is that the UK government regrets having Huawei in the UK.
“I think George Osborne, the then UK chancellor summed it up when he said: “There are some western governments that blocked Huawei from making investments, not Britain, quite the opposite,’” Lord said.
The final myth, he said, is that Huawei is asking to do something here that China won’t allow foreign companies to do in China.
“False, Nokia and Ericsson are both undertaking 5G work in China. In fact, in April this year, Nokia won a big contract with China mobile for 13 city metro and two provincial backbone networks which will form part of China Mobile’s 5G build,” he said.
Meanwhile, Lord also defended Huawei’s ability to rollout 5G technologies across Australia. Several politicians have called for the company to be banned from participating in the next-generation communications network amid fears it is effectively controlled by the Chinese government.
Lord said that carriers in Australia have been using Huawei equipment for nearly 15 years and there has never been any issue that could affect national security.
“If Huawei can deliver 4G in Australia already, why can’t it do 5G?” he asked. “We know the bar is higher for us because of our Chinese heritage”
He said that in the UK and Canada, Huawei has set up and run, at its own cost, government-endorsed evaluation facilities using security-cleared testing personnel.
“We are progressing a similar solution for New Zealand. We are also creating a briefing centre and evaluation centre in Brussels for anyone to use,” he said. Lord was expected to make an offer to fund a testing centre in Australia.
Lord claimed that Huawei was the most “audited, inspected, reviewed and critiqued global ICT player in the world.”
“We are proud that after every kind of inspection, audit, review, nothing sinister has been found. No wrong doing, no criminal action or intent, no ‘back door’, no planted vulnerability, no ‘magical kill switch,’” he said.
An ABC report earlier this week claimed that Huawei is the biggest corporate sponsor for Australian politicians’ overseas travel.